Appeal by mother against order lifting a restriction upon the father taking the child to his home. Appeal dismissed.
H (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 72 (13 February 2013)
Filed under child arrangements, children, court outcomes, family law
Search QV Blogposts
Blogroll
Recommended Links
-
Recent Posts
- 10 Sheriff Courts to Close
- Family Justice Knowledge Hub – Research Bulletin
- New Rules for Lay Representation for Sheriff Courts
- CHILD TO RETURN TO U.S. TO LIVE WITH MOTHER AS SCOTS FATHER’S RETENTION WAS ‘WRONGFUL’
- Changes to Legal Aid – A Quick Guide
- Lord Justice Ward has retired from the Court of Appeal
- British Columbia’s new law erases line between marriage and common-law
- H (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 72 (13 February 2013)
- Parental Child Abduction – A Growing Worldwide Issue.
- Florida Baby has Three Parents on her Birth Certificate
Archives
Top Posts & Pages
Categories
- Ancillary Relief
- Cafcass
- child abduction
- child arrangements
- children
- Children 4 Justice
- co-habitation
- court hearings
- court outcomes
- Court Procedure
- disgraceful
- Divorce
- domestic violence
- equal parenting
- equal parenting rights
- family law
- fathers
- Fathers 4 Justice
- financial remedies
- helpline humour
- Hobbits
- humour
- lay reperesntation
- lay representitives
- Legal Aid
- marriage
- mckenzie friends
- politics
- Research
- Scots Family Law
- Scottish Politics
- self-representation
- Sheriff Courts
- Solicitors
- Supreme Court
- Uncategorized
- unmarried fathers
- Witches
Blog Stats
- 5,838 hits
Twitter Updates
- Fathers are no less Important than mothers in a child’s life. wp.me/p2eqe2-7E 4 weeks ago
- 10 Sheriff Courts to Close wp.me/p2eqe2-a5 1 month ago
- Family Justice Knowledge Hub – Research Bulletin wp.me/p2eqe2-a0 1 month ago
- New Rules for Lay Representation for Sheriff Courts wp.me/p2eqe2-9U 2 months ago
- CHILD TO RETURN TO U.S. TO LIVE WITH MOTHER AS SCOTS FATHER'S RETENTION WAS 'WRONGFUL' wp.me/p2eqe2-9S 2 months ago
Meta
quantumvaleat · A personal view on family law
John Bolch has discussed this case here: http://www.familylore.co.uk/
It comes across as a very nasty case of alienation and coaching in which a mother cannot accept that her son should have normal contact with his father. Everyone is wrong except her and she makes complaints against the CAFCASS officer and the social worker, both of whom encourage contact, before she unilaterally suspends contact. The only thing driving the case seems to have been the mother’s opposition to contact; no evidence emerges to justify her position and it seems entirely reasonable that the judge should have decided to allow interim contact, given the immense delay between hearings.