• About
  • Child Arrangements after Separation – Scotland
  • Divorce in Scotland
  • Financial Arrangements in Divorce – Scotland
  • The Family Law A to Z: A reference book for litigants & students

Quantum Valeat

~ A personal view on family law

Quantum Valeat

Monthly Archives: December 2015

Error in Online Form E calculations – is my judgement affected?

18 Friday Dec 2015

Posted by quantumvaleat in Ancillary Relief, court outcomes, disgraceful, Divorce, family law, financial remedies, self-representation, Solicitors

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

divorce, Family Law

The HMCTS online Form E appears to have a calculation error in one part of the form – thus leading to alarmist news articles, and this morning I would imagine many divorced people who thought all the finances were resolved are waking up to this news and thinking that their settlement may be affected.

Form E is not used in every divorce case, nor in every case to resolve the finances of the marriage. Many couples rely on self-disclosure, the mediation disclosure forms, or simply use the D81 as a guide to disclosure.

The situations in which you might be asked to voluntarily complete Form E are:
– by a mediator before you attend a financial mediation session
– by your solicitor or your ex’s solicitor before attempts at reaching an out of court settlement

Where there are either: fairly complex finances, substantial assets or a lack of knowledge about your spouses finances – then you will typically be required to complete and exchange Form E.
If you are in dispute about the finances and are going through the Ancillary Relief process in court then you do have to complete Form E.

 

If you are concerned about the validity of your online divorce, please don’t worry – the form in question is used for Ancillary Relief purposes, and not to dissolve the marriage. 

 

You will not be affected by this calculation error if:

If you used old-fashioned pen and paper to complete Form and work out your own calculation

If you never exchanged Form E (obvious, I know – but best to provide clarification)

 You are unlikely to be affected by this calculation error if:

If you used a solicitor – it is highly unlikely they used the HMCTS Form E

If you used an online provider for your consent order, then Form E is very unlikely to have been used (unless the parties themselves used the online Form E prior to getting CO and relied on the figures produced by the online Form E)

You may be affected by this calculation error if:

If you used the online HMCTS Form E and didn’t check and double check the automated calculations then you are probably affected. If your judgement/settlement relied solely on the Form E figures rather than on a the usual summary of means and schedule of assets  then you may be affected and should check your calculations in the form e  – ie if neither party was represented, and the Judge at FDR took the figures at face value and gave a poor indication to get the parties to settle

 

A spokesman for HM Courts and Tribunals Service person said:

“We are urgently investigating this issue. “Officials are taking steps to identify rapidly cases where this regrettable error may have had an impact, and we will be writing to anyone affected as soon as possible.  Anyone concerned about their own court proceedings should contact formE@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk .”

Despite the press I suspect that only a very small number of people will be affected, the press speculation is alarmist and unnecessary.  Any decent family law solicitor wouldn’t rely solely on the online form E calculations and would make their own detailed  calculations of what a fair division of the marital assets would be – I doubt very much they would rely solely on the online Form E and it’s botched calculations. It’s worth noting that with the online Form E, one can input their own figures into the total boxes, so no-one should really be relying on the form to do all the calculations for them  – always check, double check and then triple check your figures.

It’s all a bit of a storm in a (Form) E cup really.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Archives

Top Posts & Pages

  • Child Arrangements after Separation - Scotland
  • Financial Arrangements in Divorce - Scotland
  • What Are Your Options if You Can't Afford a Solicitor?

Categories

Blog Stats

  • 73,535 views

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,765 other followers

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.com

Search QV Blogposts

Recent Posts

  • Professional McKenzie Friends
  • List of 86 Courts To Close
  • The Fault in the No-Fault Divorce Bill
  • Proposed Amendments to Bundles (PD27A)
  • Changes to the Child Arrangements Programme
  • Children of the Revolution
  • Cui dono lepidum nouum libellum?
  • Update on investigation into faulty online form used in divorce proceedings.
  • What Are Your Options if You Can’t Afford a Solicitor?
  • House of Commons research briefing published on rise of LiPs in Civil and Famaily Cases

Archives

  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • May 2014
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,765 other followers

Top Posts & Pages

  • Child Arrangements after Separation - Scotland
  • Financial Arrangements in Divorce - Scotland
  • What Are Your Options if You Can't Afford a Solicitor?

Categories

  • Ancillary Relief
  • Awards
  • books
  • Bundles
  • Cafcass
  • child abduction
  • child arrangements
  • children
  • Children 4 Justice
  • co-habitation
  • Communication
  • Court
  • court hearings
  • court outcomes
  • Court Procedure
  • disgraceful
  • Divorce
  • domestic violence
  • equal parenting
  • equal parenting rights
  • family law
  • fathers
  • Fathers 4 Justice
  • feminism
  • financial remedies
  • Gender
  • Gender-Neutral
  • health
  • helpline humour
  • Hobbits
  • humour
  • Law
  • lay reperesntation
  • lay representitives
  • Legal Aid
  • Litigants-In-Person
  • LW4SP
  • marriage
  • mckenzie friends
  • Mediation
  • men's health
  • parenting
  • politics
  • Research
  • same sex marriage
  • Scots Family Law
  • Scottish Politics
  • self-representation
  • Sheriff Courts
  • Solicitors
  • Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized
  • unmarried fathers

Blog Stats

  • 73,535 hits

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: